Fletching
03-01-2011, 03:16 PM
Hi Guys/Girls,
I was asked by Jakob (JEEP) to put up some details about the M-Kettle so I thought I'd get out the Kelly and do a 'pros and cons' for each of them.
First up, here's the kettles in their respective bags:
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5045/5320300264_07a7b3b8fc.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5320300264/)
both_kettles_packed (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5320300264/) by newsxter (http://www.flickr.com/people/57496601@N08/), on Flickr
You can see straight away the difference in size. I've loved using a Kelly Kettle but quite often it gets left behind on overnight trips as I'll be taking a stove of some description (usually a 'hobo' type and back-up alcohol burner in my case). It's been great on day trips for a quick brew or to sterilise drinking water.
...and in November I came across the M-Kettle (which I got from www.backpackinglight.co.uk) and being a kit freak, I thought "I'll have one of them".
It duly arrived and I'm very impressed with the compactness and the build quality. The neoprene wrap-around is a godsend as you can actually pick up the hot kettle to pour the contents. The supplied case also has 'D' rings so you can attach it to a bike or the outside of a pack. I know a lot of you guys/girls out there probably don't bother with kettles at all, but having a mini version of the Kelly certainly bags to be packed as well as a small stove for overnight stops for me. Even going ultra-light, you could forego the stove and use the M-Kettle with MRE's and to sterilise your water.
Here's a shot of the height (side on):
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5130/5319698935_91831a3074.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5319698935/)
m-kettle_01 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5319698935/) by newsxter (http://www.flickr.com/people/57496601@N08/), on Flickr
Here are some shots showing the water volumes for the kettles. I've tipped an extra bit out to be on the safe side to avoid overspills (which I'll cover in a moment):
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5084/5319699209_745e4fab6d.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5319699209/)
kelly_volume (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5319699209/) by newsxter (http://www.flickr.com/people/57496601@N08/), on Flickr
You'll see the Kelly Kettle (one pint version) holds, predictably, one pint.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5082/5320300578_0306a6ffd7.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5320300578/)
m-kettle_volume (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5320300578/) by newsxter (http://www.flickr.com/people/57496601@N08/), on Flickr
...and the M-Kettle, just over three quarters of a pint.
Now I took the kettles out into the garden for a 'field' test (there's no actual fields - or woods even - involved for me as I'm house-bound waiting for a back operation at the moment, so the back garden's got to suffice whilst all you lucky buggers are out there in the wild blue yonder!). Anyway, the only fuel I could scrabble together was very wet so time to boil will be much shorter with good dry twigs.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5282/5319699435_1a94f43778.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5319699435/)
kettles_alight (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5319699435/) by newsxter (http://www.flickr.com/people/57496601@N08/), on Flickr
The Kelly came to the boil first in this instance (I've had it the other way around) but they both came to the boil around the ten minute mark with wet fuel. I think the Kelly may be a little faster overall as it has a greater surface area to heat the water.
Well, after a couple of nice brews, I'm indoors and onto the pros and cons (as comparisons between the two):
Kelly - Pros:
Faster to boil
Holds more water so can be used less
Sturdy construction and no leaks
Can use natural fuel or an alcohol burner inside the flue
Fire base fits snugly inside the flue when upturned for transport
Kelly - Cons
Much bigger - more useful for groups than solo
Supplied bronze chain locks and snags (I replaced mine as you can see)
Awkward to pour by squeezing handle and lifting chain
M-Kettle - Pros
Still fast to boil
Very compact so will get used more
Well made (apart from a couple of design faults - see cons)
Very easy to pour with neoprene wrapper
Can use natural fuel or an alcohol burner inside the flue
M-Kettle - Cons
Holds less water - obviously - but not by too much
Water 'spout' is rather small and needs care when filling from a bottle/tap or you'll waste water
Fire base fits loosely (on mine) inside the flue when upturned for transport
There you go. There's probably more that I could add, but these are the basics of the two. I like the M-Kettle but don't get me wrong, I'm still a big KK fan (especially the larger ones for group use - can't be beaten). The 'M' is great for solo and short trip use.
Hope this helps!
Steve
I was asked by Jakob (JEEP) to put up some details about the M-Kettle so I thought I'd get out the Kelly and do a 'pros and cons' for each of them.
First up, here's the kettles in their respective bags:
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5045/5320300264_07a7b3b8fc.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5320300264/)
both_kettles_packed (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5320300264/) by newsxter (http://www.flickr.com/people/57496601@N08/), on Flickr
You can see straight away the difference in size. I've loved using a Kelly Kettle but quite often it gets left behind on overnight trips as I'll be taking a stove of some description (usually a 'hobo' type and back-up alcohol burner in my case). It's been great on day trips for a quick brew or to sterilise drinking water.
...and in November I came across the M-Kettle (which I got from www.backpackinglight.co.uk) and being a kit freak, I thought "I'll have one of them".
It duly arrived and I'm very impressed with the compactness and the build quality. The neoprene wrap-around is a godsend as you can actually pick up the hot kettle to pour the contents. The supplied case also has 'D' rings so you can attach it to a bike or the outside of a pack. I know a lot of you guys/girls out there probably don't bother with kettles at all, but having a mini version of the Kelly certainly bags to be packed as well as a small stove for overnight stops for me. Even going ultra-light, you could forego the stove and use the M-Kettle with MRE's and to sterilise your water.
Here's a shot of the height (side on):
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5130/5319698935_91831a3074.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5319698935/)
m-kettle_01 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5319698935/) by newsxter (http://www.flickr.com/people/57496601@N08/), on Flickr
Here are some shots showing the water volumes for the kettles. I've tipped an extra bit out to be on the safe side to avoid overspills (which I'll cover in a moment):
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5084/5319699209_745e4fab6d.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5319699209/)
kelly_volume (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5319699209/) by newsxter (http://www.flickr.com/people/57496601@N08/), on Flickr
You'll see the Kelly Kettle (one pint version) holds, predictably, one pint.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5082/5320300578_0306a6ffd7.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5320300578/)
m-kettle_volume (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5320300578/) by newsxter (http://www.flickr.com/people/57496601@N08/), on Flickr
...and the M-Kettle, just over three quarters of a pint.
Now I took the kettles out into the garden for a 'field' test (there's no actual fields - or woods even - involved for me as I'm house-bound waiting for a back operation at the moment, so the back garden's got to suffice whilst all you lucky buggers are out there in the wild blue yonder!). Anyway, the only fuel I could scrabble together was very wet so time to boil will be much shorter with good dry twigs.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5282/5319699435_1a94f43778.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5319699435/)
kettles_alight (http://www.flickr.com/photos/57496601@N08/5319699435/) by newsxter (http://www.flickr.com/people/57496601@N08/), on Flickr
The Kelly came to the boil first in this instance (I've had it the other way around) but they both came to the boil around the ten minute mark with wet fuel. I think the Kelly may be a little faster overall as it has a greater surface area to heat the water.
Well, after a couple of nice brews, I'm indoors and onto the pros and cons (as comparisons between the two):
Kelly - Pros:
Faster to boil
Holds more water so can be used less
Sturdy construction and no leaks
Can use natural fuel or an alcohol burner inside the flue
Fire base fits snugly inside the flue when upturned for transport
Kelly - Cons
Much bigger - more useful for groups than solo
Supplied bronze chain locks and snags (I replaced mine as you can see)
Awkward to pour by squeezing handle and lifting chain
M-Kettle - Pros
Still fast to boil
Very compact so will get used more
Well made (apart from a couple of design faults - see cons)
Very easy to pour with neoprene wrapper
Can use natural fuel or an alcohol burner inside the flue
M-Kettle - Cons
Holds less water - obviously - but not by too much
Water 'spout' is rather small and needs care when filling from a bottle/tap or you'll waste water
Fire base fits loosely (on mine) inside the flue when upturned for transport
There you go. There's probably more that I could add, but these are the basics of the two. I like the M-Kettle but don't get me wrong, I'm still a big KK fan (especially the larger ones for group use - can't be beaten). The 'M' is great for solo and short trip use.
Hope this helps!
Steve